¶1Mandamus is not available where appellant has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of appeal. See State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141; State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 1; State, ex rel. Racine, v. Dull (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 72; and In re Singer (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 130.
¶2The judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint, is therefore affirmed.
¶3Judgment affirmed.