Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 SO2D 589 - Bechtel v. Oriol

Bechtel v. Oriol’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
June 1967
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Cook · Rottman v. Beverly · Bordenave v. Texas & New Orleans R. Co. · Fontenot v. Freudenstein · Jones v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In the case at bar there is nothing to show that there was anything about the appearance of Fontenot to indicate that he was in any peril. He must have been facing towards the approaching car as he was walking. Often, in crossing a street, a pedestrian, seeing a car approaching and about to pass in front of him, continues on his course until within a few feet of the path of the car and then stops to allow it to go by. Even had Miss Freudenstein been looking and even had she seen Fontenot, there is nothing to show that she should have realized that he was not aware of the approach of her car."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.