Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 So. 2d 606

O'Rourke v. O'Rourke

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1951

Louisiana Court of Appeal · decided 1951-05-21

Relies on Causey v. Opelousas-St. Landry Securities Co. · Saint v. Martel · Succession of Fachan

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1951-05-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1979

17 state decisions

80195119601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Dr. C. Grenes Cole, one of the defendants herein, has filed an application for a rehearing, wherein he contends that Act No. *607303 of 1944 is unconstitutional. The plea of the unconstitutionality' of the statute was neither raised in nor passed upon by the lower court, and under the well established jurisprudence the question of the constitutionality of a statute cannot be considered when raised for the first time in a reviewing court. See Causey v. Opelousas-St. Landry Securities Co., Inc., 192 La. 677, 188 So. 739; Ricks v. Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co., La.App., 189 So. 466; Southern Amusement Co. v. City of Jennings, 180 La. 800, 157 So. 720; Succession of Fachan, 179 La. 333, 154 So. 15; Godchaux Sugars, Inc. v. Leon Boudreaux & Bros., 153 La. 685, 96 So. 532; Saint v. Martel, 127 La. 73, 53 So. 432; State ex rel. People’s Fire Ins. Co., v. Michel, 125 La. 55, 51 So. 66.

¶2The other grounds urged for a rehearing need not be commented upon.

¶3The application for a rehearing is denied.

¶4Rehearing refused.

/52/so2d/606 · .json · Public domain