52 So. 3d 110 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant was on a street corner some two miles from his house in a high crime, high drug area on Monday, October the 8th at 10 something at night. And if you believe what defense counsel is arguing, he was greeting friends; not selling cocaine. |2qNow, you cannot—the defendant doesn’t have to do anything and you can’t hold it against him if he doesn’t do anything and doesn’t call any witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.