52 So. 3d 339 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · McClain v. State · 469 So. 2d 68 - Edwards v. State · 805 So. 2d 452 - Simmons v. State · 616 So. 2d 298 - Noe v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Once an allegation of juror misconduct arises, then the next step is to consider whether an investigation is warranted. In order for the duty to investigate to arise, the party contending there is misconduct must make an adequate showing to overcome the presumption in this state of jury impartiality. Juror polling shall only be permitted by an attorney, outside the supervision of the court, upon written request. At the very minimum, it must be shown that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that good cause exists to believe that there was in fact an improper outside influence or extraneous prejudicial information.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.