Anderson v. Barnwell’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2001
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eylar v. Eylar · Inge v. Cain · 46 Tex. Civ. App. 151 - Teague v. Swasey · John T. Hardie & Co. v. Campbell · Gaston & Thomas v. Dashiell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The intention of the recording acts is to compel every person receiving conveyances of real property to place such an instrument of record, not only that he may thereby protect his own rights, but also those of all others who may after-wards seek to acquire an interest in the same property.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The law intends to and does favor the recorded title, and any conveyance which is duly recorded must thereby obtain all the benefits which depend upon or flow from the fact of registration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.