Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 U.S. 587 - Hogg v. Emerson

Hogg v. Emerson’s Empirical Analysis

52 U.S. 587 · 1850

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016 · most notably Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc (1966), Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co. (1940)

35 federal appellate · 15 district · 2 state decisions

14018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Joseph Shaw v. Joseph Cooper · Evans v. Eaton · Livingston Gilchrist v. The Maryland Insurance Company · Cross v. Huntly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appeared in truth to be ignorant of the existence of the patent right, and did not intend any infringement,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “connected in their design 'and' operation?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.