Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 UTAH 602 - Gee v. Smith

Gee v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1984

3 state decisions

2019181920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There are certain rules of procedure and of limitation touching appeals that must be enforced more or less rigorously for the purpose of establishing order in this court, and for the additional purposes of compelling progress in litigation and relieving interested parties from uncertainty and anxiety.” Gee v. Smith, 52 Utah 602 , 176 P. 620 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We must hold that appellant and his attorneys knew that the record would not be filed unless the filing fee was paid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.