Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

52 Va. App. 18

660 S.E.2d 687

Docket Record No. 2424-06-1.

Florio v. Clark

Joseph C. FLORIO, Appellant, v. Barbara E. CLARK, William B. Clark and Joyce Childers, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 13, 2008.

This page is marked noindex.

Court of Appeals of Virginia · decided 2008-05-13

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-05-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2021

13 state decisions

80200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Kenneth B. Murov, for appellant.

¶2Breckenridge Ingles (Julianne B. Dias, Guardian ad litem for the minor child; Martin, Ingles & Ingles, Ltd.; Foard & Dias. P.C., on brief), for appellees.

¶3Before FELTON, C.J., and ELDER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS, KELSEY, McCLANAHAN, HALEY, PETTY, BEALES and MILLETTE, JJ.

¶4

Upon a Rehearing En Banc.

¶5By memorandum opinion dated October 30, 2007, a divided panel of this Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. We stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc. Upon rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the stay of this Court's October 30, 2007 mandate is lifted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority memorandum opinion in Joseph C. Florio v. Barbara E. Clark, William B. Clark and Joyce Childers, No. 2424-06-1, 2007 WL 3144034 (Va.Ct.App. Oct. 30, 2007), and we adopt that opinion as our own.

¶6Judge Humphreys would reverse the trial court for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion of the October 30, 2007 panel.

¶7This order shall be certified to the trial court.

/52/vaapp/18 · .json · Public domain