Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Va. App. 412 - Dickens v. Commonwealth

52 Va. App. 412 - Dickens v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Crawford v. Washington · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · 7 Va. App. 10 - Blain v. Commonwealth · State v. Dedman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “formal procedures and rules of evidence are not employed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [probationer] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a "neutral and detached" hearing body such as a traditional parole board, members of which need to be judicial officers or lawyers; and (f) a written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking [probation].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “for a revocation hearing be provided: (a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [probationer] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.