Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Va. App. 735 - Harris v. Commonwealth

52 Va. App. 735 - Harris v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Nelson v. WARDEN OF KEEN MTN. CORRECTIONAL · United States v. Johnpoll · Commonwealth v. Rafferty · Shackleford v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[preliminary hearing testimony of a witness who is absent at a subsequent criminal trial may be admitted into evidence if the following conditions are satisfied: (1) that the witness is presently unavailable; (2) that the prior testimony of the witness was given under oath (or in a form of affirmation that is legally sufficient); (3) that the prior testimony was accurately recorded or that the person who seeks to relate the testimony of the unavailable witness can state the subject matter of the unavailable witness’s testimony with clarity and in detail; and (4) that the party against whom the prior testimony is offered was present, and represented by counsel, at the preliminary hearing and was afforded the opportunity of cross-examination when the witness testified at the preliminary hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.