Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 WASH 132 - State v. Simmons

State v. Simmons’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 1999

21 state decisions

501909191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Fetterly · State v. Minton · State v. Wood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Romer Zimma was called as a witness for the appellant, and in response to a question, testified that he did not see the complaining witness and a third party hugging and kissing each other at a time and place specified. He was then asked the following question: ‘Now, Romer, don’t you remember of stating to me that at the time you saw Parrot at Johnson’s, winter before last, that you saw them in the kitchen by themselves, hugging and kissing each other?’ to which an objection was sustained, and on this ruling the twentieth assignment of error is predicated. Had the witness testified to some affirmative fact prejudicial to the appellant, the ruling complained of would perhaps be erroneous. Greenleaf, Evidence, § 444. But- the witness testified to a mere negative, and had he been ever so successfully impeached the only effect would be to destroy testimony which was in itself worthless. The error was therefore harmless.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.