Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 WASH 359 - Kalinowski v. Jacobowski

Kalinowski v. Jacobowski’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2016

17 state decisions

70190919101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carpenter v. Capital Electric Co. · McCue v. Bellingham Bay Water Co. · Ashelford v. Willis · Everett Water Co. v. Powers · Van De Vanter v. Flaherty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “So far as we are able to ascertain, it has always been the law that where a servitude, such as a right of way, has been granted by an instrument in writing, the fact that the dominant tenement has not been acquired at the date of the instrument cannot, after it has been actually acquired, prevent the servitude becoming a legal accessory to the dominant tenement, provided the servitude was so used as to give reasonable notice of the burden to any person in whom the property of the land might subsequently become vested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.