Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 WASH 574 - Coman v. Peters

Coman v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 2023

20 state decisions

401909191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weinberg v. Naher · First National Bank v. Parker · Zeimantz v. Blake · White v. Krutz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “up to the moment the tender was made ... there had not been any notice, or even intimation ... to the payors ... that the interest money would be refused, or that it (payee) elected to declare the whole debt due.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.