Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Wash. 2d 456 - Decker v. Decker

52 Wash. 2d 456 - Decker v. Decker’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
9
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably Harris v. Harris (1979), 118 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Pike (1992)

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

1401958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell · Ruge v. Ruge · In re Cave · Haakenson v. Coldiron · State Ex Rel. Ridenour v. Superior Court for King County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a trial court does not accept a settlement agreement of the parties simply because of their contractual rights, but because its provisions seem just and equitable and in furtherance of sound public policy, all factors being considered.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) he can show that he does not have the means to comply with the order, or (2) he can show that the particular provision sought to be enforced has no reasonable relation to his duty to support his wife and/or children.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “relates to run-of-the-mill debtor-creditor relationships arising . . . principally, out of matters basically contractual in nature.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.