Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Wash. App. 208 - State v. Brigham

52 Wash. App. 208 - State v. Brigham’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2021

8 state decisions

4019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hill v. Lockhart · 95 Wash. 2d 616 - State v. Jones · 24 Wash. App. 495 - State v. King · 38 Wash. App. 831 - State v. Toomey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) A person is guilty of murder in the second degree when: (b) He commits or attempts to commit any felony other than those enumerated in RCW 9A.32.030(1)(c), and, in the course of and in furtherance of such crime . . . he, or another participant, causes the death of a person other than one of the participants . . .[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “instruction was harmless error. There, the victim and the defendant engaged in a fistfight. The victim was winning, until the defendant pulled out a knife and stabbed him to death. The court noted at page 210 that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[n]othing in the record indicates [the victim] helped to stab himself, or solicited, commanded, encouraged, or requested [the defendant] to do so. See RCW 9A.08.020(3).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.