52 Wash. App. 413 - State v. Steward’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2001
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 489 - State v. Eilts · 36 Wash. App. 428 - State v. Mark · 38 Wash. App. 135 - State v. Hartwell · 50 Wash. App. 401 - State v. Tindal · 50 Wash. App. 248 - State v. Raleigh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“even if she had not taken or directed the taking of such contents, it was foreseeable and likely to a reasonable person that the car would be subject to stripping and theft of the contents of the car.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to make restitution to any persons who have suffered loss or damage as a result of the offense committed by the respondent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“theft occurred as a result of the offense for which Steward was convicted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.