52 Wash. App. 657 - State v. Garnier’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 109 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Dunaway · 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 109 Wash. 2d 947 - Allingham v. City of Seattle · 106 Wash. 2d 525 - State v. Oxborrow · 98 Wash. 2d 384 - State v. Rice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f a burglar with an offender score of 29 received the same punishment as a burglar with an offender score of 9, the punishment would not be proportionate to the seriousness of the offense, promote respect for the law, or be commensurate with the punishment imposed on others committing similar offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“multiple burglaries . . . should each be counted in arriving at the offender score for sentencing. Therefore, [they] should not be used as an aggravating factor to justify an exceptional sentence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) Ensure that the punishment for a criminal offense is proportionate to the seriousness of the offense and the offender's criminal history;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.