52 Wis. 2d 122 - Day v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Henry v. State of Mississippi · 40 Wis. 2d 223 - State Ex Rel. Evanow v. Seraphim · 30 Wis. 2d 39 - State Ex Rel. La Follette v. Raskin · 45 Wis. 2d 432 - State Ex Rel. Cullen v. Ceci · Price v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While it may be argued the court had no personal jurisdiction over Day based on this complaint and he would have been discharged from custody if objection had been timely made, nevertheless he submitted to the jurisdiction of the court when he did not raise the objection before or at the time he pleaded to the information. This rule of waiver has been applied to arrest warrants, . . . and applies equally well to a defect in or to an objection to the sufficiency of the complaint. . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““With the current tremendous increase of appeals, this court does not have the time or inclination to spend time considering objections resulting from finecombing the record and second thoughts which might have been raised in the trial court but were waived excepting in most im-usual circumstances which go directly to the issue of guilt.” (Emphasis added.) Day v. State, 52 Wis.2d 122, 125 , 187 N.W.2d 790 (1971).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.