Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Wis. 2d 599 - State v. Beals

52 Wis. 2d 599 - State v. Beals’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 1991 · most notably 96 Wis. 2d 48 - State v. Rabe (1980), 57 Wis. 2d 543 - State v. Harper (1973)

26 state decisions

190197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Within the time period specified by s. 808.04(4) and in the manner provided for civil appeals under chs. 808 and 809, an appeal may be taken by the state from any: (a) Final judgment adverse to the state made before jeopardy has attached or after waiver thereof or after the setting aside of a verdict of guilty or finding of guilty, whether following a trial or a plea of guilty or no contest. (b) Order granting postconviction relief under s. 974.02 or 974.06. (c) Judgment and sentence or order of probation not authorized by law. (d) Order or judgment the substantive effect of which results in: 1. Quashing an arrest warrant; 2. Suppressing evidence; 3. Suppressing a confession or admission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A criminal defendant’s right to legal assistance is one of the most basic and important rights which is accorded by our criminal justice system. The most obvious and important function of legal counsel is to assist the suspect in preparing a defense. The right to counsel is guaranteed by art. I, sec. 7 of the Wisconsin Constitution . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.