Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Wis. 2d 708 - Salters v. State

52 Wis. 2d 708 - Salters v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably 57 Wis. 2d 17 - State Ex Rel. White v. Gray (1973), State v. Kelty (2006)

32 state decisions

18019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Brady v. United States · State v. Reppin · 43 Wis. 2d 661 - Ernst v. State · 52 Wis. 2d 144 - Rahhal v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . In order for there to be validity to the assertion, of double jeopardy there would have to he a judgment of acquittal or conviction or a dismissal of the charges and then a second prosecution begun on the basis of the same offense. . . .” (Citing with approval, State v. Schmear, supra.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In cases in which the prosecutor has moved to reduce the charge in the complaint it is . . . proper, although not mandatory, for the court to ascertain why the charge was reduced.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““ ‘. . . Threatening a defendant or intimating a greater sentence will be meted out if defendant goes to trial and is found guilty than if he pleads guilty has been condemned as being coercive. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.