Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 52 Wis. 2d 791 - State v. Haugen

52 Wis. 2d 791 - State v. Haugen’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2004 · most notably 75 Wis. 2d 575 - State v. Olson (1977), 77 Wis. 2d 261 - State v. O'CONNOR (1977)

38 state decisions

1401971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 45 Wis. 2d 432 - State Ex Rel. Cullen v. Ceci · 52 Wis. 2d 71 - Hawpetoss v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Parties to crime. (1) Whoever is concerned in the commission of a crime is a principal and may be charged with and convicted of the commission of the crime although he did not directly commit it and although the person who directly committed it has not been ¿convicted or has been convicted of some other degree of the crime t>r of some other crime based on the same act. “ (2) A person is concerned in the commission of the crime if he: “(a) Directly commits the crime; or “(b) Intentionally aids and abets the commission of it; or “(c) Is a party to a conspiracy with another to commit it or advises, hires, counsels or otherwise procures another to commit it. Such a party is also concerned in the commission of any other crime which is committed in pursuance of the intended crime and which under the circumstances is a natural and probable consequence of the intended crime. This paragraph does not apply to a person who voluntarily changes his mind and no longer desires that the crime be committed and notifies the other parties concerned of his withdrawal within a reasonable time before the commission of the crime so as to allow the others also to withdraw.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The elements of complicity, or aiding and abetting are that a person (1) undertakes conduct (either verbal or overt action) which as a matter of objective fact aids another person in the execution of a crime, and further (2) he consciously desires or intends that his conduct will yield such assistance.” (at 78)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a complaint is a self-contained charge. The document itself must set forth facts which, together with any reasonable inferences therefrom would lead a reasonable person to conclude that a crime had probably been committed and that the defendant named in the complaint was probably the culpable party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.