Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 F.2d 591 - Collins v. Ridge Tool Co.

Collins v. Ridge Tool Co.’s Empirical Analysis

520 F.2d 591 · 1975

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
6
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2022

5 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

80197519801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Dippel v. Sciano · Campo v. Scofield · Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Pruitt · Evans v. General Motors Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [Cjonformity of defendant's design to the practices of other manufacturers in its industry at the time of manufacture; 2) the open and obvious nature of the alleged danger;. . .3) the extent of the claimant's use of the very product alleged to have caused the injury and the period of time involved in such use by the claimant and others prior to the injury without any harmful incident. . . .4) the ability of the manufacturer to eliminate danger without impairing the product's usefulness or making it unduly expensive; and 5) the relative likelihood of injury resulting from the product's present design.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the unique facts of each case should bear on the question ... whether ... the dangers associated with the [machine] were indeed open and obvious to [the victim].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “... [T]here is an indication that the more recent trend of the cases evidences an increasing dissatisfaction with the Campo doctrine and opts instead in favor of an approach which reflects an effort to `discourage misdesign rather than encouraging it in its obvious form.' [Citation omitted]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.