Bowers v. Moreno’s Empirical Analysis
520 F.2d 843 · 1975
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 10 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently December 2003 · most notably Iron Workers Local # 272 v. Bowen (1980), Nedd v. United Mine Workers (1977)
23 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Moor v. County of Alameda · Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-Appellees · McCray v. United States · Almenares v. Wyman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. [0]ur statement in Bowers v. Ulpiano Casal, Inc. [ 393 F.2d 421 , 424 (1st Cir. 1968)] . . . described the violations of § 302 subject to restraint by a district court as those constituting “violations of basic structure, as determined by the Congress, not violations of fiduciary obligations or' standards of prudence in the administration of the trust fund.” This is admittedly a severe standard, but one which we concluded was compelled by legislative history and followed by the majority of cases. 520 F.2d at 846 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Botica“[p]endent jurisdiction, in the sense of judicial power, exists whenever there is a claim “arising under [the] Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Trea ties made ... under their Authority .. .,” U.S. Const., Art. Ill, § 2, and the relationship between that claim and the state claim permits the conclusion that the entire action before the court comprises but one constitutional “case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.