Mar v. Kleppe’s Empirical Analysis
520 F.2d 867 · 1975
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Munoz v. Small Business Administration (1981), Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hulsey (1994)
21 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1702 · 15 U.S.C. § 634 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on O'Shea v. Littleton · Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co. · Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Land US v. Dollar · Dugan v. Rank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) In the performance of, and with respect to, the functions, powers and duties vested in him by this chapter, the Administrator may— (1) sue and be sued in any court of record of a state having general jurisdiction, or in any United States district court, and jurisdiction is conferred upon such district court to determine such controversies without regard to the amount in controversy; but no attachment, injunction, garnishment, or other similar process, mesne or final, shall be issued against the Administrator or his property.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In light of the plain language of section 634(b)(1), we agree that it would be a bizarre result to preclude suits for over $10,000 against the SBA in federal district court when the same suit may be brought in any state court of general jurisdiction. Moreover, forcing small businesses throughout the nation to file claims against the SBA for more than $10,000 in the Court of Claims in Washington, D.C. is, without doubt, at odds with the consideration prompting the enactment of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. § 631 .... To impose upon small businesses the burdensome expense of pressing their claims in Washington, D.C., when a nearby United States District Court is available to handle the litigation would frustrate Congress’s declared policy that the government should counsel, assist, and protect the interests of small business concerns.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““That neither do Dungan v. Rank, 372 U.S. 609 , [ 83 S.Ct. 99 , 10 L.Ed.2d 15 ] (1963), Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp., 337 U.S. 682 , 69 S.Ct. 1457 , 93 L.Ed. 1628 (1949), and Land v. Dollar, 330 U.S. 731 , 67 S.Ct. 1009 , 91 L.Ed. 1209 (1947) help in the face of an express statutory consent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.