Schlotzsky's, Ltd. v. Sterling Purchasing & National Distribution Co.’s Empirical Analysis
520 F.3d 393 · 2008
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2025
5 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1055 (§ 5 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (§ 35 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States · Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. · Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. · Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde · Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 43(a) can be satisfied even though a party fails to establish a specific amount of actual loss....”). 36 . 263 F.3d at 461 (emphasis added). 37 . See Schlotzsky’s, 520 F.3d at 400 (explaining that proof that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“a threat to do something beyond the legal right of the party making the threat,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“illegal exaction or some fraud or deception,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.