Chambers v. Mukasey’s Empirical Analysis
520 F.3d 445 · 2008
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Louisiana ex rel. Caldwell v. Allstate Insurance (2008), Jaco v. Garland (2021)
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229 (§ 239 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Yu Zhao v. Gonzales · Singh v. Gonzales · Justiss Oil Company Inc v. Refining Corporation · Ignacio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Guevara v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“waived any challenge to the NTA [Notice to Appear] by appearing at the initial hearing, and pleading to the charges contained in the NTA [Notice to Appear].”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because Sohani did not object to the admission of the Notice to Appear [lacking time and date] and conceded removability at the removal hearing, Sohani has waived any challenge to the IJ's jurisdiction over the removal proceedings”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because Sohani did not object to the admission of the Notice to Appear [lacking time and date] and conceded his removability at the removal hearing, Sohani has waived his challenge to the IJ's jurisdiction over the removal proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.