Moore v. Quarterman

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 2008.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2008-03-12

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-03-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2025

8 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Thomas Scott Smith (argued), Smith & Smith, Sherman, TX, for Moore.

¶2Edward Larry Marshall (argued), Austin, TX, for Quarterman.

¶3Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

¶4BY THE COURT:

¶5A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶6IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.