Dotson v. BRP U.S. Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
520 F.3d 703 · 2008
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (§ 2 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (§ 102 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2651 (§ 401 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2652 (§ 402 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993)
Relies on 74 Ill. 2d 172 - Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc. · 151 Ill. 2d 142 - Hartlein v. Illinois Power Co. · Feldman v. American Memorial Life Insurance · Darst ex rel. Bankruptcy Estate of Chalimoniuk v. Interstate Brands Corp. · Carter v. Tennant Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Dotson apparently believes that an employer may not run FMLA leave concurrently with workers’ compensation. The FMLA regulations, however, allow employers to do just that, provided they supply the employee with appropriate notice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.