Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 N.E.2d 129 - Bates v. State

Bates v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Gregory v. State · Lámar v. State · Lamar v. State · Pettit v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Instead it merely compels the granting of a continuance under certain clearly delineated circumstances. In general, when such a motion for continuance is not based upon statutory grounds or is not made in compliance with the statute, the granting of a continuance lies within the broad discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion prejudicing the complaining party.” Id.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “of such clarity as to be intelligible and enlightening to the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.