Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 NW2D 77 - Springer v. Black

Springer v. Black’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2023

2 district · 9 state decisions

501994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division · Black Hills Jewelry Manufacturing Co. v. Felco Jewel Industries, Inc. · Raschke v. DeGraff · American Guaranty Corporation and Harry H. Burton, Receiver v. The United States · Rusch v. Kauker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) was the issue decided in the former adjudication identical to the present issue; (2) was there a final judgment on the merits; (3) are the parties in the two actions the same or in privity; and (4) was there a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues in the prior adjudication?”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to the bar of res judicata in abuse and neglect cases. [3] See infra ¶¶ 52 & 66. Rather, the judgment is properly affirmed because the fourth requirement of res judicata is not present; i.e., there was no full and fair opportunity to litigate the most recent allegation of abuse of the children. [¶ 45.] A well-established requirement of res judicata is that there must have been”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.