State v. Spisak’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
February 1994
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ker v. State of California · Flick-Reedy Corp. v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co. · 9 Cal. 3d 934 - Parsley v. Superior Court · People v. De Lago
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... if the judge or United States magistrate issuing the warrant (1) is satisfied that there is probable cause to believe that (A) the property sought may and, if such notice is given, will be easily and quickly destroyed or disposed of ... and (2) has included in the warrant a direction that the officer executing it shall not be required to give such notice. Any officer acting under such warrant, shall, as soon as is practicable after entering the premises, identify himself and give the reasons and authority for his entrance upon the premises.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.