In Re Cornelius’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2010
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Frazier v. Cupp · Burdeau v. McDowell · Holt v. United States · Couch v. United States · United States v. Kordel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The combination of investigative and judicial functions within an agency does not violate due process; a board may make preliminary factual inquiry on its own in order to determine if charges should be filed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“minimum requirements of procedural due process are not offended by the attorney for the agency acting as advisor on procedural matters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(a) Harmless Error. Any error, defect, irregularity or variance which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Poulin v. Zartman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.