Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 P2D 809 - Wolfenbarger v. Hennessee

Wolfenbarger v. Hennessee’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 2016

15 state decisions

7019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Greene v. McElroy · Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept. · 68 Cal. 2d 162 - Endler v. Schutzbank · Levinson v. Boas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... If it is necessary to procure a license in order to carry on a chosen profession or business, the power to revoke a license once granted is penal and should be strictly construed.. ... ... A city council exercises quasi-judicial powers when it acts as an administrative board authorized to revoke pawnbrokers licenses. However, it may not ignore due process nor act arbitrarily.... . The constitutional guaranty of due process of law applies to administrative as well as judicial proceedings where such proceedings are quasi-judicial in nature.... The due process clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions afford protection against arbitrary and unreasonable administrative actions.... ... Where the ordinance prescribes a particular method of procedure for the revocation of a license it must be followed. In the absence of such a provision, there must be substantial compliance with the fundamental rules of substantial justice and fair play.... An administrative hearing, particularly where the proceedings are judicial or quasi-judicial, must be full, fair and adequate; ... (Citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “right to a full hearing includes a reasonable opportunity to know the claims of the opposing party and to meet them. There must be adequate notice of the issues, and the issues must be clearly defined in order that an administrative hearing is fair. All parties must be apprised of the charges so they may test, explain or rebut it. They must be given an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and to present evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he constitutional guaranty of due process of law applies,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.