Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 Pa. 206 - Commonwealth v. Thomas

Commonwealth v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Blackwell v. Com. State Ethics Com'n (1991), State v. Chow (1994)

36 state decisions

2401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Green v. United States · Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Reddish · Commonwealth v. Cabeza · Commonwealth v. Knighton · Lush v. Commissioner of Education of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the time of sentencing, the judge shall: (a) afford the defendant the opportunity to make a statement in his own behalf and afford counsel for both parties an opportunity to present argument and information relative to sentencing;”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.