Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 Pa. 431 - Bennett v. Seave

Bennett v. Seave’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2019

4 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

1101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Schwartz · 358 Pa. Super. 618 - Houston v. National Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “extensive program designed to avoid mortgage foreclosures.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... Act 6 and Act 91 require that notice must be given before any legal action may be commenced to recover under a “mortgage obligation”, the crucial inquiry becomes what is encompassed within the definition of a mortgage obligation. Act 6 defines a “residential mortgage” to include: an obligation to pay a sum of money in an original bona fide principal amount of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or less, evidenced by a security document and secured by a lien upon real property located within the Commonwealth containing two or fewer residential units or on which two or fewer residential units are to be constructed and shall include such an obligation on a residential condominium unit. 41 P.S. § 101 (Emphasis added). Act 91 defines the term “mortgage” for purposes of the act as “... any obligation evidenced by a security document and secured by a lien upon real property located within the Commonwealth including, but not limited to, a deed of trust and land sale agreement.” 35 P.S. § 1680.401(c)(a) (Emphasis added). While it is clear from the comparable definitions of mortgage that the mortgages executed by the Appellees are within the scope of the acts, it does not necessarily follow that the notice provisions are appli cable to legal actions brought under a promissory note executed contemporaneously with the mortgage documents when recovery is limited to a separate security interest in personalty. The debts assumed by the Appellees were secured both by granting a security inte”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(c) The written notice shall clearly and conspicuously state: (1) The particular obligation or real estate security interest; (2) The nature of the default claimed; (3) The right of the debtor to cure the default as provided in section 404 of this act and exactly what performance including what sum of money, if any, must be tendered to cure the default; (4) The time within which the debtor must cure the default; (5) The method or methods by which the debtor’s ownership or possession of the real estate may be terminated; and (6) The right of the debtor, if any, to transfer the real estate to another person subject to the security interest or to refinance the obligation and of the transferee’s right, if any, to cure the default.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.