Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 Pa. 451 - Gondelman v. Commonwealth

Gondelman v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Commonwealth v. Muniz, J., Aplt. (2017), Commonwealth v. Albert (2000)

28 state decisions

1201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Dandridge v. Williams · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety and happiness. For the advancement of these ends they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may think proper.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “All men are born equally free and independent, and have certain inherent and indefeasible rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property and reputation, and of pursuing their own happiness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[¡Justices, judges and justices of the peace shall be retired upon reaching the age of 70 years.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.