Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 SO2D 131 - Crenshaw v. State

Crenshaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

101 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State (1995), 645 So. 2d 829 - Chase v. State (1994)

101 state decisions

4601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 475 So. 2d 1136 - Johnson v. State · Love v. State · Dozier v. State · 463 So. 2d 1064 - Williams v. State · Sand v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence even if otherwise inadmissible, can be properly presented where the defendant has `opened the door.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`the defense attorney inquires into a subject on cross-examination of the State's witness, the prosecutor on rebuttal is unquestionably entitled to elaborate on the matter.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] trial judge cannot be put in error on a matter which was not presented to him for decision.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.