Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 SO2D 275 - Brumley v. State

Brumley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2013

7 state decisions

501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 515 So. 2d 748 - Shull v. Dugger · 510 So. 2d 1182 - Hughes v. State · 512 So. 2d 220 - Brumley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1987), we held that a trial court must articulate all of the reasons for departure in the original order and cannot enunciate any new reasons for departure after reversal of the original sentence by an appellate court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.