Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

520 So. 2d 582

520 So.2d 582

13 Fla.L.Weekly 172

King v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 3, 1988

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1988-03-03

Relies on Winters v. State · 511 So. 2d 1131 - King v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-03-03

How this case has been cited

Cited by 226 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably 554 So. 2d 499 - Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais (1989), Trotter v. State (1990)

2 federal appellate · 210 state decisions

15901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We have for review King v. State, 511 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), in which the district court certified the following question as one of great public importance:

IS THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE STILL AN EFFECTIVE BASIS ON WHICH TO EXCEED THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM AS LONG AS THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE GUIDELINES RECOMMENDATION?

¶2Id. at 1132. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

¶3The district court’s decision is consistent with our decision in Winters v. State, 522 So.2d 816 (Fla.1988), in which we recently answered this question in the affirmative. Accordingly, we approve the decision below.

¶4It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
/520/so2d/582 · .json · Public domain