Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

520 So. 2d 650

520 So.2d 650

13 Fla.L.Weekly 521

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 23, 1988

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1988-02-23

Relies on Strickland v. Washington

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-02-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2015

1 district · 7 state decisions

801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1After a full evidentiary hearing, the trial court concluded that defense counsel’s alleged deficiencies of failing to object to evidence presented by the state would, under proper objection, have been cured and overcome by the state, and that the remaining deficiencies were simply tactical in nature. More importantly, on the assumption that the deficiencies were established, the trial court nonetheless found that under the circumstances, they would not have altered the result. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984). The order denying the defendant’s motion for post-judgment relief made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed.

/520/so2d/650 · .json · Public domain