Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 SW2D 166 - State v. Triplett

State v. Triplett’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
June 1986
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Smith · State v. Holbert · State v. Hutchinson · State v. Caffey · State v. Pruitt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendant also advances the argument that he was denied a fair trial and that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated because he was unable to cross-examine and confront Kenneth King [the victim], * * * King did not appear as a witness at defendant’s trial. But the state has no obligation to place any person on the witness stand in a criminal trial. State v. Eaton, 302 S.W.2d 866, 874 [8] (Mo.1957). Likewise, there is no requirement that a defendant be confronted by all witnesses who might have been called by the state. State v. Napolis, 436 S.W.2d 645, 649 [8] (Mo.1969); State v. Nolan, 499 S.W.2d 240, 251 [6] (Mo.App.1973). Because King never did testify at trial, the right to cross-examine and confront him never arose. State v. Ivey, 442 S.W.2d 506, 508 [4] (Mo.1969). Defendant’s allegations on this point are without merit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.