Thompson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 2017

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2017-06-20

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 2018

3 state decisions

Relies on Burston v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2017-06-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Jamikeo Thompson appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

¶3. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2015, unless otherwise indicated.