Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 520 U.S. 461 - Johnson v. United States

Johnson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

8,605
cited by 8,605 later decisions
22
cited 22 times by the Supreme Court
46
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

3,963 federal appellate · 54 district · 1,382 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8,605 later decisions (22 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2026 · most notably Puckett v. United States (2009), Neder v. United States (1999)

3,963 federal appellate · 54 district · 1,382 state decisions — followed in 46 states

5.1k01997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Gideon v. Wainwright · Arizona v. Fulminante · United States v. Young

Cited together with United States v. Olano · Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Booker · United States v. Cotton · Blakely v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8,605 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    179 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If all three conditions are met, an appellate court may then exercise its discretion to notice a forfeited error, but only if (4) the error seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    124 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “it is enough that an error be 'plain' at the time of appellate consideration.”
    59 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.