United States v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2013
1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent · Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence · Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n addition to the restrictions and requirements specified in sections 13g to 13k of this title, the Marshal of the Supreme Court may prescribe such regulations ... as may be deemed necessary for the adequate protection of the Supreme Court Building and grounds and of persons and property therein, and for the maintenance of suitable order and decorum within the Supreme Court Building and grounds.” 3 .Appellant Williams did not agree that warnings were given as he passed the barricade, but did admit he heard subsequent warnings. Ap pellant Pearson’s recollection was similar to that of appellant Williams. 4 . Appellant Williams also carried a sign which read "The Gift of Life, God’s Special Gift.” 5 . 40 U.S.C. § 13k provides: It shall be unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds, or to display therein any flag, banner, or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice any party, organization or movement. The unlawful entry charge was based on 40 U.S.C. § 13 / and Regulation Two. See supra note 2. 6 . The first clause of section 13/ refers to "parade, stand or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[biased on its provisions and legislative history, it is fair to say that the purpose of the Act was to provide for the protection of the building and grounds and of the persons and property therein, as well as the maintenance of proper order and decorum” and noting that 40 U.S.C. § 13k”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“to permit the unimpeded access and egress of litigants and visitors to the Court and to preserve the appearance of the Court as a body not swayed by external influence”— were”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.