Caro v. Schultz’s Empirical Analysis
521 F.2d 1084 · 1975
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 701
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · 360 F. Supp. 1247 - Hackley v. Johnson · Sperling v. United States · Bowers v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in its discretion, as appropriate, remand, take testimony to supplement the administrative record, or grant the plaintiff relief on the administrative record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a trial court should find a need for additional facts on a particular issue, the matter may be remanded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Weahkee v. Powell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.