Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 F.2d 114 - Dorothy Bruno v. Hon. Calvin K. Hamilton

Dorothy Bruno v. Hon. Calvin K. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis

521 F.2d 114 · 1975

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
January 1991
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 1991 · most notably Osh Oshd Weyerhaeuser Company v. Marshall (1979), United States v. Saunders (1980)

13 federal appellate · 2 district ·

150197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wingo v. Wedding · O'Shea v. United States · Walter Olie Noorlander v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Director · Bridwell v. Ciccone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the district court has inherent power to review the final decisions of its magistrates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.