Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 F.2d 1318 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

521 F.2d 1318 · 1975

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably United States v. Rewald (1989), United States v. Harrison (1975)

45 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

31019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952

Relies on Clancy v. United States · United States v. Bell · Ogden v. United States · Lewis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only if the court concludes that a producible statement existed and that substantial rights of appellant were affected by the failure to make that statement available for his use in cross-examination.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a written statement made by [the] witness and signed or otherwise adopted or approved by him,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is the function of the trial court to determine the issue of producibility, i.e., to decide whether the notes in question constitute a 'statement' within the meaning of the Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.