Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 F.2d 194 - Paul v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

Paul v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

521 F.2d 194 · 1975

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
September 2018
most recently cited

69 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2018 · most notably Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic (1984), LOZADA (1988)

69 federal appellate ·

33019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cruz v. Hauck · Parham v. Cortese · Infelice v. United States · Michigan v. Ohio · Page v. Work

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[T]he inquiry goes to the question whether or not there has been an exercise of administrative discretion and, if so, whether or not the manner of exercise has been arbitrary or capricious.' Paul v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 5 Cir., 1975, 521 F.2d 194 , 197.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] claim of the denial of due process because of ineffective assistance of counsel must allege sufficient facts to allow this court to infer that competent counsel would have acted otherwise.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “. . . the basis for the decisions below was the insufficiency . . . of petitioners' own statements in discharging their burden of proving that they possessed a well-founded fear of political persecution if deported.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.