Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 521 F.2d 215 - Wallace v. Ener

Wallace v. Ener’s Empirical Analysis

521 F.2d 215 · 1975

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably Nissho-Iwai Co. v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc. (1984), Ramos v. Liberty Mutual Insurance (1980)

28 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

25019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Delancey v. Motichek Towing Service, Inc. · Stancill v. McKenzie Tank Lines, Inc. · Bailey v. Kawasaki-Kisen · Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Michael

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the close of the evidence or at such earlier time during the trial as the court reasonably directs, any party may file written requests that the court instruct the jury on the law as set forth in the requests. The court shall inform counsel of its proposed action upon the requests prior to their arguments to the jury, but the court shall instruct the jury after the arguments are completed. No party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection. Opportunity shall be given to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'The admissibility of evidence is within the sound discretion of the district court ... and even if error is found it must of course rise above the threshold of harmless error.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.